• the Daily hi thread just say hi :)
  • All contentious threads including politics, religion, crime, immigration, laws, elections etc are banned & will be removed. There is still a Gun Related Politics section for relevant topics.

Battle of Agincourt, some interesting stuff.

This is a great thread
@Enfield2band I'm going to try and explain the best I can why no artifacts and any kind of evidence has ever been found on the official battlefield and they never will find anything.
Here it is, 1500 yards wide at the top and 1000 yards wide funnelling down to 800 yards.
View attachment 462793
The key is the centre. The centre is at least 400 yards from the flanks at any given point. If Henry places his archers on the flanks which is written in all accounts BTW how is he going to defend the centre with only 1500 men at arms? Think about it. The maximum range of the longbow is 280-300 yards. If the French march down the centre of the battlefield, down the road then they are out of longbow range. Henry would never fight here in a month of Sundays, its too wide for archery support.
All the accounts say the archers were on the flanks and were hitting the centre where most of the damage was done.
Ain't no way no archer hits the centre of this battlefield and that's why they can't find arrow heads.
What is the evidence to support the mainstream view that this is the site of the battle?
 
Looking on google actually some people seem to agree with your assessment.


They put the burial pits in the same general areas that you have highlighted, you may well be right.
 
This is a great thread

What is the evidence to support the mainstream view that this is the site of the battle?
There isn't any, the battlefield survey failed to find one single artifact.
 
Having a rummage around online for WW2 activity in the area and I've turned up something that will explain a lot of the soil disturbances right on your site unfortunately ... :(

Maisoncelle was the location of a V1 launch site and was obviously visited by the RAF at some point judging by the proliferation of bomb craters in the aerial photo.


 
Having a rummage around online for WW2 activity in the area and I've turned up something that will explain a lot of the soil disturbances right on your site unfortunately ... :(

Maisoncelle was the location of a V1 launch site and was obviously visited by the RAF at some point judging by the proliferation of bomb craters in the aerial photo.


Yes its took a few hits but a lot of the ground disturbances are square. The small bomb craters wouldn't account for the trauma in the field unless the launch site was in that field but it does put a new twist to it.
 
I'm glad you posted that pic, I now know where the tree line is for the battlefield. (y)
 
Having a rummage around online for WW2 activity in the area and I've turned up something that will explain a lot of the soil disturbances right on your site unfortunately ... :(

Maisoncelle was the location of a V1 launch site and was obviously visited by the RAF at some point judging by the proliferation of bomb craters in the aerial photo.


The V1 site is just north of Maisoncelle and not in my proposed battlefield but bombs could have hit. Judging by the craters they are not big bombs. It does however discount the French attacking the English from the east so my battle direction has to be wrong.
There is a row of trees which I think is the edge of a wood.
This means if the French attack Henry at L'Anglais they come from the north or west.
Interesting.
 
It is very interesting I'm glad you posted this on here.

I'm curious about the arrow penetration. I have seen two examples of this.
One was with compressed air and the arrow bounced off at close range.
The second was with an arrow loosed from a Longbow. The arrow penetrated (I can't recall at what distance) but because the arrow was in flight when it hit the armour it expended its energy by waggling up and down and this in effect caused the arrow to bore into the armour.

Something else to think about, possibly.
 
I think the soil damage you've highlighted in this pic is most likely bomb damage.
1000012795.jpg


The 2015 imagery on Google Earth shows up the V1 site really nicely, particularly the launch ramp
1000012796.jpg


1000012794.jpg

A few of the rings of nettles next to sheds make me think they've been feeding cattle out as well, especially.


Love looking at satellite images. This was nice to find on our neighbours farm (2020 drought), hill fort overlooking the river. The round earth ditches clearly show up
1000012793.jpg
 
I think the soil damage you've highlighted in this pic is most likely bomb damage.
View attachment 462950

The 2015 imagery on Google Earth shows up the V1 site really nicely, particularly the launch ramp
View attachment 462955

View attachment 462954
A few of the rings of nettles next to sheds make me think they've been feeding cattle out as well, especially.


Love looking at satellite images. This was nice to find on our neighbours farm (2020 drought), hill fort overlooking the river. The round earth ditches clearly show up
View attachment 462956
Feeding cattle might not produce high nitrogen in the soil, it would if it wasn't eaten and left.
Usually you'll find nettles in patches are caused if you spill amonium nitrate fertilizer, heaps of dung or pits.
It can be many things. Pits are just one example.
The real crux of the argument is when you find oblongs or squares which cannot be accounted for.
That's why I'm in this field. Annomolies not seen anywhere else in the area and I'm on it like a rash especially when its near L'Anglais.
This is where I'd start my survey with my detector. There is no where else to start. The official field has been done and nothing so you start at the last known English position and where there is at least ground activity.
 
You'd think the bombing and construction would have turned up artifacts , but I guess they had other things on their minds at the time.
 
That's why I'm in this field. Annomolies not seen anywhere else in the area and I'm on it like a rash especially when its near L'Anglais.
This is where I'd start my survey with my detector. There is no where else to start. The official field has been done and nothing so you start at the last known English position and where there is at least ground activity.
Well stop faffin' about on here , off you trot and get detecting ... :)
 
You'd think the bombing and construction would have turned up artifacts , but I guess they had other things on their minds at the time.
When they built Ferrybridge power station they destroyed an entire bronze age settlement and never said a word. Twenty years ago they found a chariot and burial site next door during the A1M construction.
 
Feeding cattle might not produce high nitrogen in the soil, it would if it wasn't eaten and left.
Usually you'll find nettles in patches are caused if you spill amonium nitrate fertilizer, heaps of dung or pits.
It can be many things. Pits are just one example.
The real crux of the argument is when you find oblongs or squares which cannot be accounted for.
That's why I'm in this field. Annomolies not seen anywhere else in the area and I'm on it like a rash especially when its near L'Anglais.
This is where I'd start my survey with my detector. There is no where else to start. The official field has been done and nothing so you start at the last known English position and where there is at least ground activity.

I'm not disagreeing with your post #1 in the thread, just the follow up in post #19. The linear features you picked up in post #1 are definitely the place to start.

Fed plenty of cattle and find they either 💩 their beds or their plates. The amount of dung and disturbance around a ring feeder is amazing, and any weed seeds are concentrated in the bottom, then new bale on top so goes fousty and gets left.

The circles here are from ring feeders being used before I was born, 35+ years. The shed had a roof for starters 🤣 still get nettles now even with spraying there's so much seedbank left behind
1000012798.png
 
They banned detecting years ago in most of France, you need a permit.
Couldn't you put it in the bottom of a shopping bag so its not obvious?.....Just joking.

A small point, nettles will grow where the ground has been disturbed and rubbish has been dumped they don't need fertiliser.
 
Couldn't you put it in the bottom of a shopping bag so its not obvious?.....Just joking.

A small point, nettles will grow where the ground has been disturbed and rubbish has been dumped they don't need fertiliser.
Depends how long the nitrogen lasts. They are very, very nitrogen hungry just like Barley, wheat and other grasses.
If you get patches that last decades you know something is down there supplying it. The archeologists always look for it, any kind of difference in a field that stands out that cannot be accounted for.
Celtic rubbish pits full of human waste, animal bones and discarded organic matter still have a habit of producing high growth many years later. You can see them on Aerial shots in certain places.
 
Back
Top