Old but still fully capable of producing quality shoots! Have you thought about moving over to the Z models?Cheers, Nikon D500 and Sigma Sport 500mm f4.
Heavy old bit of kit
Those were a few quick snaps through an open window, light was a bit low so the iso bumped a bit
I've thought about it a couple of times, but to be honest I really like my D500 for wildlife and bif, so I'm not really looking at swapping bodies.Old but still fully capable of producing quality shoots! Have you thought about moving over to the Z models?
Definitely, I've had it a while and I know it's capabilities and limitations so I'm pretty tuned in to getting decent shots from it.Put simply, if it ain’t broke don’t fix it !
Back when I had a d7000 I so wanted a d500, an excellent piece of kit![]()
TBH @antsz Nikon D500 does not have the bells and whistles of the lower range z series, but its 12.3 megapixels ( edit : 20 megapixels , cheers @Wozza )is more than enough to produce good shots through its DX format, with the price of DSLR Nikon cameras and lenses dropping because of the Z series ( and of course Nikon phasing DSLR out , by that no new models or F series lenses) upgrading to a 810 or 850 is a better bet, having said that if your happy with a camera why change? I still use my D1 for monochrome shots, old well used but still very capable. 5 megapixel.Old but still fully capable of producing quality shoots! Have you thought about moving over to the Z models?
Good points there, the D500 is 20.9mp thoughTBH @antsz Nikon D500 does not have the bells and whistles of the lower range z series, but its 12.3 megapixels is more than enough to produce good shots through its DX format, with the price of DSLR Nikon cameras and lenses dropping because of the Z series ( and of course Nikon phasing DSLR out , by that no new models or F series lenses) upgrading to a 810 or 850 is a better bet, having said that if your happy with a camera why change? I still use my D1 for monochrome shots, old well used but still very capable. 5 megapixel.
View attachment 972199View attachment 972200
Silly me 5000 is 12mp, nay matter , your camera is a good un , I am getting too old.Good points there, the D500 is 20.9mp though![]()
D300 is 12mp as well, easy to get them all confusedSilly me 5000 is 12mp, nay matter , your camera is a good un , I am getting too old.![]()
D300 is 12mp as well, easy to get them all confused![]()
Of course, I was only asking as I made the jump to the Z range after shooting with my D850. Personally, the best thing I did (I'm not a hobbyist nor pro, but I do get paid for some of my work). I had a bit of time with Sony with some of there high end gear, superb, but I'm a Nikon man and switched back. As you say, its defintley the glass that counts. I have a range of Z lenses, and I also have an L-mount camera. I now hire lenses when I have a good shoot coming up.TBH @antsz Nikon D500 does not have the bells and whistles of the lower range z series, but its 12.3 megapixels ( edit : 20 megapixels , cheers @Wozza )is more than enough to produce good shots through its DX format, with the price of DSLR Nikon cameras and lenses dropping because of the Z series ( and of course Nikon phasing DSLR out , by that no new models or F series lenses) upgrading to a 810 or 850 is a better bet, having said that if your happy with a camera why change? I still use my D1 for monochrome shots, old well used but still very capable. 5 megapixel.
View attachment 972199View attachment 972200
I made the jump to Z this year, my trusty old D200 finally gave up.Of course, I was only asking as I made the jump to the Z range after shooting with my D850. Personally, the best thing I did (I'm not a hobbyist nor pro, but I do get paid for some of my work). I had a bit of time with Sony with some of there high end gear, superb, but I'm a Nikon man and switched back. As you say, its defintley the glass that counts. I have a range of Z lenses, and I also have an L-mount camera. I now hire lenses when I have a good shoot coming up.