My sentiments entirely.Thinking out loud here, but is the weak point here is the fact that most users initially think that the laminate stocks are as strong as plywood? And then get a nasty shock when a modest tap snaps it at the wrist?
The bad news is that to look really pretty, the laminates are laid up with the grain running in the same direction, rather than each layer being at 90 degrees to its neighbours.
I've seen stocks made out of ply. They look shit. You don't want to put your hand anywhere near a thin bit of any layer, as you expect to get a palm full of splinters.
The laminate manufacturer possibly could do something about it, but it would need the rifle manufacturers, or the stock makers, to insist (and possibly pay a little extra for) on making the blanks stronger.
I'm thinking that they could lay the central layers down as a 90 degree ply, and then the outer layers inline for aesthetics. Just needs the stock maker to say how many layers are in the strong central band, and how many decorative layers each side after.
If the stock makers added a couple of layers of glass or carbon fibre into the mix, the stocks would be a darn sight stronger. Another option would be to drill through the stock in a similar way to the maestro @1260engineer has done in this thread and bond in some carbon dowel or 2.
There was a discussion with @chouchin66 and myself on a similar thread in springer lounge.
I’ve been contemplating another 77 or 97, can’t decide between laminate or beech; and that got me wondering about their behaviour.
I’ve read a few comments over the years about the way different stock materials transmit the recoil/forces created by a springer.
Thumbhole stocks aren’t for me, so I’ve already discounted the synthetic option, and having owned one previously I did feel it made the 97 a bit ‘buzzy’ and front heavy due to the lack of mass.
Does natural wood (be that beech, walnut or something else) absorb more of the recoil and resonance than laminate, can you detect any...
I’ve read a few comments over the years about the way different stock materials transmit the recoil/forces created by a springer.
Thumbhole stocks aren’t for me, so I’ve already discounted the synthetic option, and having owned one previously I did feel it made the 97 a bit ‘buzzy’ and front heavy due to the lack of mass.
Does natural wood (be that beech, walnut or something else) absorb more of the recoil and resonance than laminate, can you detect any...
- Varminter
- Replies: 18
- Forum: Springer Lounge
Last edited: