Umarex M29

bootneckbob

Super member
Joined
Jul 6, 2022
Messages
2,004
Reaction score
5,490
Location
Bideford
I bought these 2 for Xmas. Both BB versions.
IMG-20241225-WA0007~2.jpeg

I'd been holding off for a long time but my father in law died recently and left a Umarex 686 in one of his drawers. The mrs asked me to get rid which I have now; @robs5230 had it off me but not before I tried it to make sure it was working ok. After some cracking results at 6 yards I was sold on the M29; a long lost Dirty Harry 'need'. The 8" .44 magnum was also my first ever replica gun when I was about 10 years old.

Anyway today was the first opportunity to test them properly. Although I bought both the 6.5 and 8" models I wasn't sure about keeping both. As a homage to Dirty Harry keeping both was entirely feasible, however another mate at the club was also keen on one, and I decided to let the 6.5 go (without testing) to another home and in his own words, "made his day".

So, just the 8" to test now. I should caveat this post with I can, and do shoot 10m AP competitively with a Walther LP500 Expert; I'm under no illusions about the capabilities of the Umarex M29; but I think I've watched just about every review on youtube on them over the last few weeks.

So rather than go on in super detail on here here in the first 30 rd group shot at 10m supported (on the pistol grip) with a 2 handed grip to give it a decent chance after the initial shots through the chrono. Although these are BB versions, my intent was always to shoot pellets with them/it.

Shot with JSB Exacts as I had them spare, 230 fps at 12C.
IMG_20241228_170816.jpg


I did find 60 shots as claimed is ok, pushing on to 70 wasn't, but 2 groups of 30 with one capsule isn't bad. All in I did 6 capsules with testing. Tried pulling the barrel through after 200 rds or so.
IMG_20241228_182158.jpg


I think the poi shift is my aiming as the other groups were all low in the black, only the first 30 was higher. Also, I had to shim the rear sight to get the elevation for 10m. Ideally it needs a touch more. That said, here's a 6 shot freehand (not supported) group at 10m.
IMG_20241228_174102.jpg


Last 30rd group of the day was done on Econ 2. I had stayed off the Econ as I thought at 300 fps they might just rip the card to bits. As it goes, although they did, it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. No adjustment had been made to the sights.
IMG_20241228_183332.jpg


So, all in not too bad. Given these are cheap plinkers and fun guns those groups would knock down tin cans at 10m all day long.
 
I think these are all great results, from what is essentially a pellet firing replica Rob

As you know, I'd struggle to achieve that, with a dedicated 10m pistol.
 
Thanks Rob. Good job that 686 wasn't a 568 with an 8" barrel. Looking forward to seeing how Ruperts M629 Competitor stands up as a pellet version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P8X
I bought these 2 for Xmas. Both BB versions.
View attachment 635986
I'd been holding off for a long time but my father in law died recently and left a Umarex 686 in one of his drawers. The mrs asked me to get rid which I have now; @robs5230 had it off me but not before I tried it to make sure it was working ok. After some cracking results at 6 yards I was sold on the M29; a long lost Dirty Harry 'need'. The 8" .44 magnum was also my first ever replica gun when I was about 10 years old.

Anyway today was the first opportunity to test them properly. Although I bought both the 6.5 and 8" models I wasn't sure about keeping both. As a homage to Dirty Harry keeping both was entirely feasible, however another mate at the club was also keen on one, and I decided to let the 6.5 go (without testing) to another home and in his own words, "made his day".

So, just the 8" to test now. I should caveat this post with I can, and do shoot 10m AP competitively with a Walther LP500 Expert; I'm under no illusions about the capabilities of the Umarex M29; but I think I've watched just about every review on youtube on them over the last few weeks.

So rather than go on in super detail on here here in the first 30 rd group shot at 10m supported (on the pistol grip) with a 2 handed grip to give it a decent chance after the initial shots through the chrono. Although these are BB versions, my intent was always to shoot pellets with them/it.

Shot with JSB Exacts as I had them spare, 230 fps at 12C.
View attachment 635999

I did find 60 shots as claimed is ok, pushing on to 70 wasn't, but 2 groups of 30 with one capsule isn't bad. All in I did 6 capsules with testing. Tried pulling the barrel through after 200 rds or so.
View attachment 636011

I think the poi shift is my aiming as the other groups were all low in the black, only the first 30 was higher. Also, I had to shim the rear sight to get the elevation for 10m. Ideally it needs a touch more. That said, here's a 6 shot freehand (not supported) group at 10m.
View attachment 636013

Last 30rd group of the day was done on Econ 2. I had stayed off the Econ as I thought at 300 fps they might just rip the card to bits. As it goes, although they did, it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. No adjustment had been made to the sights.
View attachment 636012

So, all in not too bad. Given these are cheap plinkers and fun guns those groups would knock down tin cans at 10m all day long.
Hardly cheap at over £200 retail. Mine is the 6.5 partially rifled version. So accurate, it's the only gun I've ever owned that's hit the bull at 6 yards on the first shot after sighting in.
 
The only thing that isn't close to the real thing, is the calibre of the fake cartridges.

The real pistol shoots .44 calibre, but the fake cartridges are the same size as a .38 calibre cartridge.

Would it have really been so difficult to make the cartridges .44 calibre?

My ASG Dan Wesson 715s have the correct calibre cartridges, so why not my M29?
 
The only thing that isn't close to the real thing, is the calibre of the fake cartridges.

The real pistol shoots .44 calibre, but the fake cartridges are the same size as a .38 calibre cartridge.

Would it have really been so difficult to make the cartridges .44 calibre?

My ASG Dan Wesson 715s have the correct calibre cartridges, so why not my M29?

I have a 6.5” model 29 and a 5” model 27. Barrel length aside, they are identical apart from the calibre. Both are head and shoulders above my much newer 5” 686 plus in quality and feel. I should do a side by side range test….

It is a shame such a great replica has been let down but such a simple mistake though, but I reckon it’s only us nerds who care!?😁
 
Hardly cheap at over £200 retail. Mine is the 6.5 partially rifled version. So accurate, it's the only gun I've ever owned that's hit the bull at 6 yards on the first shot after sighting in.
That's true but I bought these at just over a £100 each. The BB versions are reduced in price whilst the pellet ones are not.
 
I did 30 shots this evening with the Econ 2, supported pistol grip the same as yesterday.


IMG_20241229_183203.webp


Other than not being clean holes, I'm pretty happy with that.
 
What's wrong with the trigger?
It’s just bloody heavy , particularly in double action, in single not so bad. Might loosen up after a couple of hundred tins of pellets I suppose but I doubt it.
The trigger on my Webley revolver is in comparison excellent.
 
The only thing that isn't close to the real thing, is the calibre of the fake cartridges.

The real pistol shoots .44 calibre, but the fake cartridges are the same size as a .38 calibre cartridge.

Would it have really been so difficult to make the cartridges .44 calibre?
I'm sure that .44 cartridges could be made but then they would have to do .45 ones for the SAAs etc..

As it stands the "38" cartridges fit all the Umarex shell loading guns. At the price of the shells I'm rather glad that I don't need several different lots of shells to suit each gun.
 
They are a very good replica, surprisingly close to the real thing, though slightly closer to the M27 in detail
I have a 6.5” model 29 and a 5” model 27. Barrel length aside, they are identical apart from the calibre. Both are head and shoulders above my much newer 5” 686 plus in quality and feel. I should do a side by side range test….
It is a shame such a great replica has been let down but such a simple mistake though, but I reckon it’s only us nerds who care!?😁

I would personally say that apart from the cartridges being sized in keeping with the .357 Magnum, the Umarex Model 29 replica is visually much closer to the Model 29 than the Model 27.

The Mod 27 has a slimmer barrel profile with a notable taper around the lug that protects the ejector rod, the Mod 27 cylinder is noticeably shorter than the frame window with a longer protrusion of the barrel to compensate. Also the top strap of the 27's frame featured checkering to stop reflection.

By contrast the model 29 features a straight walled barrel profile and longer cylinder almost entirely filling the frame window and no checkering on the top strap - all things the Umarex faithfully copies.

The only thing that isn't close to the real thing, is the calibre of the fake cartridges.

The real pistol shoots .44 calibre, but the fake cartridges are the same size as a .38 calibre cartridge.

Would it have really been so difficult to make the cartridges .44 calibre?

My ASG Dan Wesson 715s have the correct calibre cartridges, so why not my M29?

With the exception of the Dan Wesson 715, the criticism about the cartridges applies to most of these replicas. It is a shame, but, I suppose it makes financial sense for the manufacturer to have a 'one size fits all' approach on this.
 
Last edited:
I would personally say that apart from the cartridges being sized in keeping with the .357 Magnum, the Umarex Model 29 replica is visually much closer to the Model 29 than the Model 27.

The Mod 27 has a slimmer barrel profile with a notable taper around the lug that protects the ejector rod, the Mod 27 cylinder is noticeably shorter than the frame window with a longer protrusion of the barrel to compensate. Also the top strap of the 27's frame featured checkering to stop reflection.

By contrast the model 29 features a straight walled barrel profile and longer cylinder almost entirely filling the frame window and no checkering on the top strap - all things the Umarex faithfully copies.
Well, blow me! I had not noticed the barrel or top strap differences before! The cylinder is shorter by necessity, and the frame gap must be filled somehow, but the checkering was a surprise!i

45E02C3B-A209-459D-A4BA-F17375A44374.webp
 
Well, blow me! I had not noticed the barrel or top strap differences before!

Specsavers?

The .44 Special Model 24 used the same barrel profile as the Model 27 and the later produced .44 Magnum Model 629 Mountain Gun also used the taper profile barrel - in this latter example it was a 4 inch barrel revolver intended for being carried in country where there is a risk from large and dangerous game e.g. bears so it was a lighter weight gun intended for carrying and only occasional shooting.
 
Back
Top