Just over 3 years ago, the very first gun that I ever restored was a rather rusty, early .177 Hurricane. Flushed with the success (!) of this initial foray into renovating old Webley pistols, since that time almost a dozen Tempests have passed through my hands. Like many users, I tended to prefer the ergonomics of the Tempest and so that first Hurricane didn't really get that much use, so about a year ago when someone placed a 'Wanted' ad. for a good .177 example, on the spur of the moment, I decided to sell it. As is often the case, I soon rather regretted it....
A couple of months back on
Guntrader, I spotted a .177 Hurricane described as an, "
Ugly duckling in need of some TLC," that was realistically priced in relation to its condition and the information that it was currently very low powered. I went ahead and bought it and upon receipt, I had to agree that it wasn't a very handsome example and it also struggled to discharge a pellet from the barrel. I've detailed in a previous thread, how the low power was due to a most unusual and disintegrating form of breech 'seal' and how once that had been rectified, the pistol performed more than adequately. However, attempting to transform this
ugly duckling into something more akin to a 'swan,' wasn't going to be as quick and simple a procedure as replacing that seal.
At this stage, I'm no longer that surprised when I see the combined effects of a lack of patience, the wrong tools and general cack-handedness, manifested in various forms on these Webleys. Nonetheless, I still so
wish that some people would have treated these pistols with a modicum of respect and common sense when it came to embarking upon some
maintenance. This Hurricane was no exception and apart from that 'interesting' breech seal, a previous owner had gone on to attempt the removal of the trigger pins with possibly an old nail and for some reason, attacked the stirrup catch and it's retaining pin quite enthusiastically with another implement of torture. Hmmm....
Prior to this, I've not had cause to try and remove gouges from these particular components, so there followed some lengthy and nifty moves with my set of needle files on these little parts. I'm currently hampered by a rather sore, blistered, 'mystery' rash all over my fingers, which are not at all conducive to either using my hands in an everyday fashion or in particular, working on guns.....so due to this, I've really struggled with this project. With regard to the plastic fore-end/shroud, in most previous cases, I've laboriously polished out any scratches, abrasions etc., but in this instance, my hands just weren't up to the task and I had to be resigned to buying a new one from Knibbs. However, this was the
only expenditure on this pistol, as I already had a breech seal 'in stock' as well as the new trigger pins, which I decided to install in the end.
Overall, I'm around 95% happy with the restoration. There is still some slight, visual evidence remaining of the pistol's past journey through its own
Webley World of Woe, as my ministrations (and my poorly fingers!) weren't up to completely eradicating every scar, but it aint looking too bad really.
As is my usual
modus operandi, after a thorough cleaning, the spring guide was polished, spring ends likewise and the cocking slot smoothed, before everything was re-lubricated and put back together. The mainspring didn't look to be in bad condition at all, so replacement wasn't required at this juncture. However, Steve (
@Troy.T. ) swears by the quality and performance of Chambers' springs and I must admit to being tempted to try a couple in the not too distant future. For the present though, the current one cocks relatively easily, shoots smoothly and is producing an average of 450 fps using Excite Econ II pellets, which is more than acceptable.
View attachment 632775View attachment 632776View attachment 632781View attachment 632782View attachment 632783View attachment 632784