• the Daily hi thread just say hi :)
  • All contentious threads including politics, religion, crime, immigration, laws, elections etc are banned & will be removed. There is still a Gun Related Politics section for relevant topics.

The running cost of an electric car - it's now no better than petrol!

What? Next thing you'll be saying it is is possible to see the shipping lanes on Windy.com NO2 map.

View attachment 98001
But you can see this live tracking of ships
20221111_180117.webp
 
Now that Ofgem is no longer protecting the consumer in the UK and is actually encouraging energy companies to scank our eyeballs out, there will be no cheaper alternatives no matter which direction you turn.
Governments used to be about protecting us, not any more. Governments are now bought and sold by big energy firms, pharmacutical companies and who ever else is the biggest bidder.
 
What happens when the technology has only 2 choices left ?
It can't stop in time, it can either swerve left into a group of school children or right into a group of pensioners ?
Who is responsible for the programming of this ?
Who will be held responsible ?
A human driver would likely be able to physically see many other options.
Granted this applies more so to the whole self driving car thing, yet that is what we are now bordering on.
All i can see this "technology" creating is a generation of very unsafe drivers relying on technology, playing on their phones believing that the car will take care of it.
60mph rural road yet the car read the sign wrong.

Not the first time it has done it either.

Another time it was a 30mph road and it read the sign as 80.

Screenshot_20221111-184434_Gallery.jpg
 
I think @OldStock was saying it tongue in cheek…
I was being straight (for once), there have been days, with less wind when you can see a tight path along the coast, a dirty highway on the sea. I often give thanks I don't live just south of the Alps as the build up there seems to be intense and regular. A few other European countries are also much worse than the worst of the UK.
NO2.webp
 
Last edited:
I was being straight (for once), there have been days, with less wind when you can see a tight path along the coast, a dirty highway on the sea. I often give thanks I don't live just south of the Alps as the build up there seems to be intense and regular. A few other european countries are also much worse than the worst of the UK.
Language eh? Yes I meant that you were serious you can see the trails - I took it you were saying it sort of sarcastic funny - “what? next you’ll be saying…”

Anyway, we’re all in serious agreement on the matter 👍🏻
 
What happens when the technology has only 2 choices left ?
It can't stop in time, it can either swerve left into a group of school children or right into a group of pensioners ?
Who is responsible for the programming of this ?
Who will be held responsible ?
A human driver would likely be able to physically see many other options.
Granted this applies more so to the whole self driving car thing, yet that is what we are now bordering on.
All i can see this "technology" creating is a generation of very unsafe drivers relying on technology, playing on their phones believing that the car will take care of it.
Far too many drivers around here are busy playing on their phones in their regular cars. At least self-driving cars won't be drunk, over-tired, putting on their makeup etc.

I vote the car should swerve into the school kids though, that should keep me safe!
 
What happens when the technology has only 2 choices left ?
It can't stop in time, it can either swerve left into a group of school children or right into a group of pensioners ?
Who is responsible for the programming of this ?
Who will be held responsible ?
A human driver would likely be able to physically see many other options.
Granted this applies more so to the whole self driving car thing, yet that is what we are now bordering on.
All i can see this "technology" creating is a generation of very unsafe drivers relying on technology, playing on their phones believing that the car will take care of it.
With a self-driving car those two choices would only result as a consequence of the kids and pensioners jumping into the path of the car in a most unanticipated fashion.

The only approach self-driving can take in order to stand up to safety scrutiny is to obey every rule of the road, and drive in a defensive, risk managed manner. That way it won’t drive itself into a position where it cannot be reasonably considered to safely navigate the upcoming road risks, consequently progress will but be much more staid than human driving, but granted it may still have to take emergency in response to the actions of others. In which case it’ll follow the rules of the road and stick to its allocated space, or possibly enter other free road space if deemed safe to do so.

We end up in such situations because our risk appetite to make progress is higher than that of self-driving can be, chiefly because we get away with it the vast majority of the time through cooperation and negotiation, all bending the rules a little to get by. On the odd occasion things do go wrong, we’re reacting in the moment and society cuts us some slack if we don’t achieve the optimum outcome because it was a surprise and we’re only human. Society won’t cut preprogrammed self-driving the same slack because it should have all been thought through beforehand, hence the highly risk managed, steady as she goes approach.
 
What happens when the technology has only 2 choices left ?
It can't stop in time, it can either swerve left into a group of school children or right into a group of pensioners ?
Who is responsible for the programming of this ?
Who will be held responsible ?
A human driver would likely be able to physically see many other options.
Granted this applies more so to the whole self driving car thing, yet that is what we are now bordering on.
All i can see this "technology" creating is a generation of very unsafe drivers relying on technology, playing on their phones believing that the car will take care of it.
Re the technology, for decades it was pretty consistent that about a quarter of all motor insurance claims result from one car running into the back of another, from the days of British Leyland to those of the smartphone. Modern auto-brake of the sort in the Mach E discussed previously cuts the claims rate for front-to-rear crashes by at least a half, generally a bit more. It’s effective in pedestrian and cyclist crashes too, and they can be particularly expensive insurance wise if people are seriously hurt.

Another quarter of claims arise from parking and manoeuvring, chiefly whilst reversing. This has grown as styling has affected visibility, and cars get more complicated and expensive to repair. Camera systems help a bit, but simple systems which pop the brakes on the moment before the driver reverses into another car or a bollard are hugely effective.

Electronic stability control has been proven to reduce fatal single vehicle crashes by a quarter to a third depending on vehicle type, and is hugely effective at preventing rollover of taller vehicles.

Granted some tech is proving less effective than anticipated and can be a little obtrusive to drive with, but we’re continually working to polish that. But you can see why insurers enthusiastically endorse the tech, because us humans have always been prone to the odd driving cock up long before smart phones, and cars were all about screens and connectivity.

On the other hand the drawn out gestation of self-driving has made people including me realise just how bloody good us humans are at successfully driving by ourselves and in close proximity to one another with a bit of give and take.
 
Last edited:
@colin99999, don't forget about tyre technology, the vast improvements in rubber based compounds has aided in significantly reducing stopping distances in the wet and dry, and prevented many from ending up in the scenery on bends etc. (y)
 
Now that Ofgem is no longer protecting the consumer in the UK and is actually encouraging energy companies to scank our eyeballs out, there will be no cheaper alternatives no matter which direction you turn.
Governments used to be about protecting us, not any more. Governments are now bought and sold by big energy firms, pharmacutical companies and who ever else is the biggest bidder.
Best laugh I've had this week.
 
Wow- fantastic. Truly wonderful to read your post.
On a few occasions driving round the town I've had occasion to 'test' the pedestrian avoidance. Scary when it happens, but the teenager crossing the road without looking with their phone glued to their face never knew what nearly happened!

Colin, I've attached this video- is it broadly your experience?


@jesim1- sorry mate I seem to have taken over your post, I'm keen on EV's and happy to help anyone who is considering making the jump. And there's many more EV's available now. I see loads every day. Quite a surprise really.

I'll take a back seat from now on!
No apology needed, and feel free to keep chiming in, real world experience is always beneficial, and this is not a thread for or against electric cars, they are the future whether we like it or not, but there are still a lot of grey areas, options, and decisions to be made by people depending on their likely usage (y)
 
Indeed we do! It’s been the work of me and my team for the past 10+ years understanding the tech, the effects it has on crashes, injuries and repairs, and developing assessments to guide it in the right direction to the benefit of your insurance.

Ford have done a great job of the crash avoidance and assisted driving tech on the Mach E - glad to see someone understanding it and using it to great effect. I was holding out for one myself as a company car but cars just weren’t coming in time when I needed to change so ended up in a Model 3 instead, complete with tow bar no less.

Great post otherwise, if you can take advantage of all their potential upsides they’re cheap as chips to run. Stellar residual value too at the moment so OP look at the depreciation rather than the initial purchase price.
This work is commendable. However there are significant concerns around the safety of motorcyclists and autonomous cars. When will the tech be there to work effectively for all road users not just tin can drivers?
 
Talking about ships, my last vessel was at the forefront of modern marine engine and fuel technology. I was Captain of her and when she left the building yard in China 2016 she was the largest and most sophisticated of her type in the World. Apart from wind power she is the cleanest for the environment.



Well, that knocks my “ I once stood behind Keith Chegwin in a patrol station “ claim to fame into a cocked hat.
 
Back
Top