joe average
Member Extraordinaire
Quite unique, what’s that all about, it’s either unique or it isnt
Quite unique, what’s that all about, it’s either unique or it isnt
I, prefer, the, Shatner, comma.The Oxford comma! I’ve been awake for an hour and already I’m having to deal with an Oxford comma.There’s enough material here for a thread all of its own, are you for the Oxford comma, against them or couldn’t give a to$$?
I’ve proof read the above to death, please don’t there be any mistakes.
I know someone exactly like that, doesn't realise what he's saying.I swear more than normal but an exworkmate was the extreme. He'd swear constantly, often without realising.
One day, he had to go to the offices and was chatting to people he knew. A female secretary said "please mind your language". His response was "what's the matter, I haven't said f*** all"![]()
Generally, if I'm asking you a question it's because I want to know the answer , so you don't need to tell me to listen !!!With politicians, its either -so' or more commonly 'well listen...". If a politician starts a sentence with that, it's always because they know they can't properly explain something away
Couldn't agree more. AGF is like being in a pub or some other social setting where formal speech counts for zilch. I don't give a toss how people communicate in text form - it's what they're saying that matters. My grammar and spelling on here is erratic, partly due to large thumbs and predictive text doesn't help. Also, I don't always feel the need to check what I've tapped out. If someone wants to criticise use of language rather than what a member is trying to convey, well, feck 'em - life's too shortMy preference would be not to drag in spelling or grammar errors on the Forum which is usually free from such
"Grammar Nazis."
yep, thats ow we talks round 'ere...Bugger arrr!
I was in the pub, The Rusty Axe, and heard two old boys talkingyep, thats ow we talks round 'ere...
I have a book by Bruce "Withnail and I" Robinson about Jack the Ripper. Huge thing, 850 pages. I swear if he took out all the unnecessary profanity (i.e. all of it), it would be about 600 pages. I don't really care for profanity in any written work, unless it is specifically quoting what someone else said, and even then it can be censored. To fill a non-fiction work with it is inexcusable. Having said that, as I get grumpier in my old age, my own postings can get a little more "fruity" than I would care to share with a maiden aunt...In my mind a lot of people swear too much. I don't take offence at swearing, I just think to myself you could have said the same in half as many words if you didn't swear.
Exactly we're not here to pass English exams.Couldn't agree more. AGF is like being in a pub or some other social setting where formal speech counts for zilch. I don't give a toss how people communicate in text form - it's what they're saying that matters. My grammar and spelling on here is erratic, partly due to large thumbs and predictive text doesn't help. Also, I don't always feel the need to check what I've tapped out. If someone wants to criticise use of language rather than what a member is trying to convey, well, feck 'em - life's too short![]()
Or turning every sentence into a question by finishing it with "yes".Similar to starting every sentence with the word "like". Drives me mad.![]()
In Norwegian, the equivalent of “Can I get?” Is considerered to be very rude manners. Their polite, “Jeg wil jerner har,” (I yearn to have) is much nicer.Send people back to school, one that irritates me is “can I get” when what they actually mean “I would like”
…..dom
I liked the thread where he was caught out .Do you remember "carnivore"?
His grammar rants could be entertaining/irritating/pedantic
Amended:
There are a few memebers who have appeared since I joined and I wouldn't miss their contributions. S*it happens, I guess.