Leon83
Super member
I have something interesting and I don’t know if it’s original Japanese made or some clone. But it feels like quality scope and glass is clear.
Simpler times...Why didn't we panic about parallax back in fhe day?
Jap glass - says JAPAN on it, sort of gives it awayI have something interesting and I don’t know if it’s original Japanese made or some clone. But it feels like quality scope and glass is clear.
View attachment 100210View attachment 100211View attachment 100212View attachment 100213
Yes, all made by Hakko. I've had identical 3-9 x 40 gloss scopes branded Bushmaster, Tasco and Hunter.There was a certain amount of "badge engineering" going on back then. I have a Jap Tasco AG 2-7x32 but mine is badged Optima, I also had a Tasco AG 3-9x50 but that was badged Edgar bros, both identical Jap scopes to the Tasco.
Cos we probably didn't know it existedWhy didn't we panic about parallax back in fhe day?
In the 70's and 80's I never saw a parallax scope and most of the time we didn't see mags either. 4x32, 4x40 and 6x40 were the most popular, no mildot, no parallax errors because everything was fixed. Then you enter the 90's and all hell breaks loose. There's AO, there's big adjustable mags with parallax errors galore, all SFP. If you were doing FT you needed to stay on the same mag or your brain exploded with parallax correction data.Why didn't we panic about parallax back in fhe day?
I had one come on my titan mpt along with a big tasco, stuck a little whitetail on it & flogged the optima for 150 & the tasco for 125, i was chuffed as the titan stood me at only £90 then, they are sought after for collectors who want them for 80's guns. looked damn silly in the little mpt though.Yes, all made by Hakko. I've had identical 3-9 x 40 gloss scopes branded Bushmaster, Tasco and Hunter.
The horrible great Optima 3-9x56 Super Moonlighter was identical to the ASI superscope.
I like the AG range. I had the 4x40AG on my Theoben Sirocco, lovely glass.View attachment 100232View attachment 100233View attachment 100234View attachment 100235View attachment 100236
Top one is the classic pre big mag FT scope, the Tasco 2-7 x 32 AG. Next one is a 8-32 x 44 Tasco, this was branded World Class but is identical to the earlier TS ones. Then a 4 x 40 AG and a pair of Hakko 8-40 x 56 scopes, one branded Tasco, the other Nite Hunter, followed by a gloss Bushmaster branded 3-9 x 40. I've got a few more Hakkos too, all good.
Yes, lovely image quality, I've still got the box and everything for the 4 x 40 on that FWB Sport. I've only had the 2-7 x 32 for a couple of weeks and it's just brilliant. Even though it's mid 1980s it's perfect for regular general shooting with a non-FAC rifle, you'd struggle to match it these days, though I think Sightron might make something similar and Burris and Leupold make some lovely little scopes too. They were expensive in their day, I think the 2-7 x 32 AG cost about the same as an HW77 in the late 80s.I like the AG range. I had the 4x40AG on my Theoben Sirocco, lovely glass.
My Japanese 4 x 40 Golden Antler TV view sat on a few springers and then it sat on my HW90K for 27 years, had loads of use in all weathers and it is probably still in use today (not mine anymore) bloody shame i let them go.I smashed a lot of em with an HW90 rammer, they didn't like rammers.![]()
Beeman short scope worked in a similar fashion.Heres a couple that are actually sitting on my desk..
The Mint Bushnell Lite-site Scopechief V 4X that my good freind @Johny64 gave me is VERY intersting. I *think* it was one of the first illuminated coloured reticles - 1970's?????. Apparently you could change colour of the Ret by replacing a small disk of tinted Cellophane. ???? (Not an expert in this field).
View attachment 100505
View attachment 100506
Got one on mine at presentI had a golden antler on my superstar...lovely scope![]()