• the Daily hi thread just say hi :)
  • please everyone if you have a question and get given a possibe solution if it works please update your thread as it may help others.

Old Daystates

Go on. Admit it. You made that you didn't you 😅

Not guilty.

The earlier target stocks had a large tip like this:

Midas 1 - Copy.webp

Later ones had a smaller tip, more like this:

DSC03912 - Copy.webp
 
Last edited:
I would say in terms of the modern pre-charged air rifle (and lets not forget the single stroke pneumatics as well) the period from roughly 1980 to 2000 was pretty much a golden era of design and development of factory 'production' models (I specify production as I don't want to take away credit from the smaller artisan manufacturers who were making guns on a bespoke scale e.g. ISP / Ripley / Bowkett / Mick Dawes and others).

In terms of the Rapid, I did have a Rapid 17 over twenty years ago, it was a nice rifle very capable and accurate, however I never really got into them personally, but that is a reflection of my preferences not any issue with the rifle itself.
You are correct those where the days everthing seemed to be exciting and interesting👍 now its just more of the same with more features than anyone really needs just for market share.

rapids/raw should have a cylinder option(other than the tm1000) they handle so much nicer,i have a impact gsx revolution they really are great
 
I would get on and sort it.

As to originality, I think it has already been modified, the spring fitted on the bolt shaft is not original, also it looks like the loading port has been opened up as well.

Daystate did an open channel loading aperture instead of the fiddly right hand side port as standard later in the run of the Mk1, but those ones didn't have the dovetail cut for a rear sight in front of the loading port that I can see on your rifle.

I do like the early 'large' schnabel target stock on it.
Loading port
20260416_192526.webp

Someone looks to have butchered the back end too but for what I paid I can live with it.
20260416_192612.webp

It came with a story that it apparently was a first prize in a very early HFT comp in someone's rather large back garden.
How true that is I don't know but there's no way of proving it, it came from an rfds private stash and 2-3 times a year he mentions about buying it back.
 
You are correct those where the days everthing seemed to be exciting and interesting👍 now its just more of the same with more features than anyone really needs just for market share.

rapids/raw should have a cylinder option(other than the tm1000) they handle so much nicer,i have a impact gsx revolution they really are great
Like cars-modern guns are “style-over-substance”.
Pretty CNC’d Italian stocks, with flimsy metal.
 
Loading port
View attachment 958502
Someone looks to have butchered the back end too but for what I paid I can live with it.
View attachment 958504
It came with a story that it apparently was a first prize in a very early HFT comp in someone's rather large back garden.
How true that is I don't know but there's no way of proving it, it came from an rfds private stash and 2-3 times a year he mentions about buying it back.

I can't comment on the provenance of it being a prize or anything.

However, the loading port looks more like an after market modification (very well done though) as it isn't the style Daystate did from the factory when they finally abandoned the fiddly port - unfortunately I don't think I have a picture of the one I had wth the updated port.

At the back end all tha has been done is the original safety catch has been ditched (they weren't great to be honest) and added a power adjuster using the hole that the safety retaining screw went into, pity they did a bit of a gash job of cutting the channel in the stock.

Personally if it were mine I would change that adjuster to one less inviting of tinkering and have the stock restored.
 
Last edited:
No.

All of mine are spotless inside and out, plus these are no lightweight thin walled tubes.

Also the guns run relatively low pressures, the non-regulated rifles don't go above 150 Bar, the regulated 2000 can run up to around 180 Bar.

Based on several threads on here I would have more concern about their bottle guns, given the failures of the boss where the bottle screws to the action.
Absolutely
Daystate used to hugely over engineer their guns. Safety factors well above what any more modern gun does.

Now 1.5x test cylinders are common (and scare me senseless given I work with extreme pressure stuff)
Daystate used 4-1 and sometimes 6-1 as a margin.
Very little beats quality steel for a rifle cylinder (especially given I paid less for my .338 Lapua magnum than some PCP’s cost)
 
Now 1.5x test cylinders are common (and scare me senseless given I work with extreme pressure stuff)
Daystate used 4-1 and sometimes 6-1 as a margin.
Very little beats quality steel for a rifle cylinder (especially given I paid less for my .338 Lapua magnum than some PCP’s cost)

I used to own a Ripley that was specially built for the late Tom Walton following the failure of his GC2, it had a stainless tube that apparently was rated at 60,000 psi fail pressure - the downside was being pretty thick walled it was bloody heavy!
 
As the weather was nice when I got home from work I decided to get some pictures of the 2000 and the other two Daystate's I didn't have pictures of.

The 2000:

View attachment 957804
View attachment 957805
View attachment 957809 View attachment 957810
View attachment 957811

The 2000 is a bit different to the other Daystate's, as it is more of a 'straight pull' action, the button on the right side of the breechblock releases the bolt for cocking and hold it locked on closure.

Huntsman FTR (Mk1) / CS1000 stock / Zeiler 6-24x44:
View attachment 957812
View attachment 957813

Huntsman Mk2 / Leslie Hewett 3-9x40:
View attachment 957814
View attachment 957815

You have a lot of very nice guns and certainly some of the best ever made by Daystate.
 
Back
Top