Not watched the video yet so my comments , may be brought up in the video.Interesting. When I first heard about this new calibre I was wondering what the point of it was, however clearly it is pitched at a lead ban and so could work, albeit here in the UK. 22lr subs are the main draw of the .22lr. I wonder if a subsonic will work in .21?
They could use .22 short!There's nothing to stop them using a short case and a longer 60gr bullet for subsonics if they've specified in a faster twist rate for the rifles.
There's a lot of issues this could resolve with 22LR but the question is will it catch on? Nobody knows. It could be the next big thing, it might by the next 17 HM2.![]()
Genuine question . Would that not mean the rifle would only be suitable for the subsonic only ?There's nothing to stop them using a short case and a longer 60gr bullet for subsonics if they've specified in a faster twist rate for the rifles.
There's a lot of issues this could resolve with 22LR but the question is will it catch on? Nobody knows. It could be the next big thing, it might by the next 17 HM2.![]()
Aguila Ammunition has had heavyweight / short cased bullets , for years - " Aguila SniperGenuine question . Would that not mean the rifle would only be suitable for the subsonic only ?
What I was meaning is would the shorter high velocity bullet work in a barrel designed for the longer heavier bullets ?Aguila Ammunition has had heavyweight / short cased bullets , for years - " Aguila Sniper
Subsonic " using a 60 gr. pill. The issue wuth pushing a heavier bullet faster , in .22 LR , is exceeding SAAMI/ CIP allowable chamber pressures.
Based on velocites / bullet weight there will be a break point at which a given range of bullet weights will stabilize & be accurate. I'd say for decent accuracy 1:16 is questionable for anything but tin cans... perceptions of accuracy differ. Off topic a bit - the reason the .244 Remington ( later 6mm Remington) failed in compare to the .243 Winchester is a slight twist rate difference 1:12 for the former, was only good up to 90 grains, whereas 1:10 in the Winnie would do 105 grains.What I was meaning is would the shorter high velocity bullet work in a barrel designed for the longer heavier bullets ?
From some of what I have seen about the SSS is that they often work better in a 1:9 twist than the 1:16 but others say they work well in their 1:16 .
Not sure what these 'pills' you speak of areAguila Ammunition has had heavyweight / short cased bullets , for years - " Aguila Sniper
Subsonic " using a 60 gr. pill. The issue with pushing a heavier bullet faster , in .22 LR , is exceeding SAAMI/ CIP allowable chamber pressures.
Aguila Ammunition has had heavyweight / short cased bullets , for years - " Aguila Sniper
Subsonic " using a 60 gr. pill. The issue with pushing a heavier bullet faster , in .22 LR , is exceeding SAAMI/ CIP allowable chamber pressures.
Not sure what these 'pills' you speak of are, but the Aguila Sniper SubSonic (SSS) with it's 60gn bullet had stability issue in all the standard barrelled 22lr rifles we tried but in the ARs using the m261 and Ciener kits they were spot on, twists rates of 1:9" to 1:7".
I still have about a thousand of these left, for when I want something to stay hit when I hit it.