Mick_Green
Proactive member
I would say that once you find the pellets that your barrel likes the best, you want to be cloverleafing .177 pellets at 30 to 40 yards indoors. That cloverleafing will be down to the shooter and not the rifle.
I've found, that in general, under competition conditions, a good rimfire will shoot tighter groups than an air rifle under almost all conditions and ranges.It would be not as good as expected. Quality pcps can shoot 3 out of 5 shots through the same single pellet hole at 25 yds not all the time but quite regularly depending on the capabilities of the shooter i have a rifle that will shoot 3 out of 5 at 50yds quite often. But is an exceptional rifle not the norm. I am in a full bore rifle club I would say the .22rim fire lads in general dont shoot groups anywhere near as tight as the air rifle guys generaly. The ranges are 25 and 50yds indoors.
Bit of reading, seems like it's centre to centre (c-c) when discussing group size and accuracy.Are groups measured centre to centre, or maximum edges? Makes a huge differance at the granularity discussed here. 12mm centre-centre at 50 yards, could be 16.5mm edge to edge, that's a roughly 85-90% increase in group size.
Measuring group size, extreme spread ( furthest outside to outside) of holes & then deduct 1 caliber.Are groups measured centre to centre, or maximum edges? Makes a huge differance at the granularity discussed here. 12mm centre-centre at 50 yards, could be 16.5mm edge to edge, that's a roughly 85-90% increase in group size.
Good 12 fpe airguns can do half MOA at shorter ranges (25M and less) in calm, that's what I expect from my guns. I have to say your 0.3 MOA requirement for centerfires is tough, most people are happy to achieve even sub MOA continuously at 100M. Personally I can do occasional 0.4 MOA group but not all the time. These were 5 shot groups, shoot ten shot groups and things get even worse.
The generally accepted routine for group sizes is centre to centre and my target analysis software works that way - However, when batch testing .22lr match ammunition and their figures are outside edge to outside edge - So an Eley test group of 10 shots at 50m of 12mm would be one tight group - al lot different than a C to C 12mm group.Are groups measured centre to centre, or maximum edges? Makes a huge differance at the granularity discussed here. 12mm centre-centre at 50 yards, could be 16.5mm edge to edge, that's a roughly 85-90% increase in group size.
The generally accepted routine for group sizes is centre to centre and my target analysis software works that way - However, when batch testing .22lr match ammunition and their figures are outside edge to outside edge - So an Eley test group of 10 shots at 50m of 12mm would be one tight group - al lot different than a C to C 12mm group.
These are typical 50yd groups with my Anschutz Match 54 rifle :
View attachment 717127View attachment 717128 And I would say that is about the same size I would get with my 6mmbr at 100yds, so about twice as accurate.
Save yourself the hassle of maths and download the Ballistic-X App .
There are several apps that will give you accurate group measurement from a scan or photo as long as you set the reference correctly.
I've used "OnTarget" for a long time.
This is 200yds with my 6mmbr at .2moa
and some ammo testing at 50yds with my Anschutz:
View attachment 717265
View attachment 717266



Using a .177 springer at 25m the best rested 5 shot group I have achieved is 7mm edge to edge which I understand is just under 1 MOA.
Don't think I am going to do much better thank this as I get older!