-
the Daily hi thread
Everything else being equal, are magazine fed rifles less accurate/consistent than manual loaded?
- Thread starter Cam
- Start date
I see no difference in accuracy between the magazine and SSL on the HW100. As it doesn’t shoot from the magazine and the pellet probe pushes the pellet to the same distance each time I’ve never understood why (on that rifle at least) there should be a difference
Yes. 
There's a reason most top target shooters use single shot loaders, or load manually or no mag.
There's a reason most top target shooters use single shot loaders, or load manually or no mag.
Martin T
Super member
Yes, single shot rifles can be more accurate than magazine fed rifles because there is less chance of the pellet being damaged. The difference can be very small, but there is a difference.
I think you're chasing pretty small gains, but yes, all else being equal the single shot will be more accurate. Deformation in the magazine, having to push it harder with the probe, very small deviations in alignment with the pellet and barrel are all going to have a certain amount of influence.
I recall, I think, cloverleaf, giving some detailed advice on this topic a while back - that might have been in relation to the execution of the system on the Steyr H5A.
I recall, I think, cloverleaf, giving some detailed advice on this topic a while back - that might have been in relation to the execution of the system on the Steyr H5A.
Bucket_of_Rats
Super member
I had a Brocock that was innacurate on shot 3 and 7 from the mag and I could not for the life of me see what the difference was ... even with a magnifying glass
Yeah, I was thinking the same, but when on loading, say a TX200, I defy anyone to say that they can load the pellet perfectly concentric into the breech, yet accuracy does not seem to be diminished?
CDH
Keen member
I imagine the pressure used to hold pellets in place in magazines can create small imperfections but surely it will all come down to the type of breach?
Wing Commander
Member Extraordinaire
There is probably a difference but it will depend on the magazine and the rifle.... some are better than others.
I can't say I am disappointed with the accuracy of any of my magazine rifles...... cutting playing cards in half at 50 yards is accurate enough for me.
I can't say I am disappointed with the accuracy of any of my magazine rifles...... cutting playing cards in half at 50 yards is accurate enough for me.
Teutchter Boy
Super member
Yes and no, in that for most the margin is so small as to be unintelligible from their own shooting ability (i include myself in that). I did use to notice a big difference in an old daystate magazine but now I only use a ssl when tuning or zeroing at distance. Otherwise magazines are just easier and more convenient when hunting or plinking.
BobP
Super member
I think it depends on the magazine system, systems like the Air Arms S410, HW100, HW110 or systems that dont use spring loaded magazines should be every bit as accurate as a single shot rifle. The problems come with the spring loaded magazines that hold the pellet against the wall of the magazine as its offered up to the breach. It is effectively pushing the pellet to one side of the barrel opening. Then when the shot is fired and the probe is pulled back, the magazine snaps the drum round to the pellet, possibly causing damage to the soft lead.
That's a difference scenario and question though, right? At no point either via SSL or Mag would anyone say the pellet is concentrically the same.....
I think this also depends on the definition of accuracy - I don't know of any benchrest shooter who uses a magazine. I know plenty of range and HFT shooters who use magazines who claim the same accuracy.
It all comes down to how "accuracy" is measured. The generic statement "more accurate" - I would say, just based on the laws of physics and interaction that less moving bits which come into contact with a pellet had to be a good thing and aid overall accuracy.
Most target rifles will let you load the pellet directly into the breech - not even using a tray. There must be a reason for this.
I would still say that less interaction with the pellet will result in the single shot loaded pellet being more accurate.....
ChatGTP agrees 
Yes, single-shot air rifles are generally more accurate than magazine-fed air rifles — especially when considering high-precision shooting like target or benchrest shooting.
Yes, single-shot air rifles are generally more accurate than magazine-fed air rifles — especially when considering high-precision shooting like target or benchrest shooting.
Here's why:
1. Pellet Alignment
- Single-shot rifles: The pellet is manually inserted directly into the breech, ensuring perfect alignment with the barrel.
- Magazine-fed rifles: Pellets are automatically fed from a magazine, which can slightly misalign the pellet with the bore. Even small misalignments affect accuracy.
2. Pellet Deformation
- Single-shot loading: The shooter can place the pellet carefully, avoiding damage to the skirt or head.
- Magazines: Inserting and cycling pellets through a magazine can deform them, especially softer lead pellets. This can result in inconsistent flight behavior.
3. Tighter Tolerances
- High-end single-shot rifles often have tighter breech-to-barrel tolerances because they don't need to accommodate the variability that comes with magazine feeding.
4. Consistent Seating Depth
- With single-shot loading, pellets can be seated uniformly (either by hand or with a seating tool), ensuring consistent initial conditions for each shot.
- Magazines often seat pellets to varying depths, depending on design and pellet length.
5. Mechanical Simplicity
- Fewer moving parts in single-shot mechanisms mean less vibration or mechanical disruption during firing, aiding repeatable precision.
Summary Table:
| Feature | Single-Shot | Magazine-Fed |
|---|---|---|
| Pellet alignment | Excellent | Variable (can be slightly off) |
| Pellet deformation risk | Low | Moderate to High |
| Mechanical complexity | Low | Higher |
| Precision & consistency | Higher | Slightly lower |
| Speed of shooting | Slower | Faster |
Paynut
Member Extraordinaire
SSL Rifles ie.S400/200 are accurate as a matter of course in my experience, i have both.
Compared with my 510 mag fed, not much in it, even with the Rowan SSL in the 510
Some of my lower end rifles are slightly better with a SSL Ultra CLX and Krals, but not drastically, so i would be on the fence in all honesty
Compared with my 510 mag fed, not much in it, even with the Rowan SSL in the 510
Some of my lower end rifles are slightly better with a SSL Ultra CLX and Krals, but not drastically, so i would be on the fence in all honesty
captainslow
Super member
I have never been a fan of spring loaded magazines. I have owned a few fx’s and notice a big improvement changing to single shot.
I have some other rifles that use a system similar to the hw100. These perform just about as good from the magazine as they do from a single shot loader.
I have some other rifles that use a system similar to the hw100. These perform just about as good from the magazine as they do from a single shot loader.
GridNorth
Super member
I can't detect any difference with my S510 but that could be because I'm not that good. But, neither are most other people. I can't see any reason why a high quality well engineered magazine should do any of the things people are talking about. In any case many of the single shot loaders still have mechanical moving parts. Perhaps there is a case to be made with a break barrel but I'm not convinced with a PCP and a high quality magazine.
I think it all comes down to personal experience - for me, loading a single pellet directly into the barrel beats anything else - thats why target rifles let you do that
For "reasons" - see above Personally, I can get close with some mags - other mags are horrendous.....however for out and out accuracy, pellet straight into the barrel every time