nikvanorton
Member Extraordinaire
I came across an Evanix Viper the other day. I’ve always been curious about them but never seen any for sale in the UK, so when it cropped up, tempataion was too much and I bought an ‘F’ marked .22. Interesting to put it alongside my GK1 and make a few observations.
Both are self-indexing, i.e. just pull the trigger until the mag’s empty. By most measurable criteria, the GK1 is the better gun. The biggest problem with the Evanix is the sights. Fitted open sights are non-adjustable (??) and the picatinny rail where a red dot would go is on the part of the slide that pulls back to cock the action which has to have a little bit of play. In practice this doesn’t cause too much of a problem but it’s not ideal.
Fit and finish is superb on the Evanix, probably a little better than the Huben (bear in mind that it’s VERY good on the GK1) and although the mags are lower capacity, they are interchangeable. It also feels quite a lot smaller in the hand, although in real terms it’s not that much. You can use the (crappy) open sights with pretty much any silencer, unlike the GK1. Having a Foster connector attached to the gun is a great idea - no hunting for probes.
The GK1 is a Meccano gun - you can spec it as a carbine, change grips, sights, and there’s a ton of 3d printed bits available, wheras the Evanix is not supported in that way. If you like messing about, the Huben is the clear winner. Accuracy wise, both are exceptional.
These pistols are at the very cutting edge of current air gun technology and the self-indexing systems work flawlessly. If I could only have one it would have to be the GK1, but I’m very glad that I’m lucky enough to be able to have both.
(In the pics below, the GK1 has an aftermarket 1911 style grip and a stock adapter fitted).
View attachment 764932View attachment 764933
Both are self-indexing, i.e. just pull the trigger until the mag’s empty. By most measurable criteria, the GK1 is the better gun. The biggest problem with the Evanix is the sights. Fitted open sights are non-adjustable (??) and the picatinny rail where a red dot would go is on the part of the slide that pulls back to cock the action which has to have a little bit of play. In practice this doesn’t cause too much of a problem but it’s not ideal.
Fit and finish is superb on the Evanix, probably a little better than the Huben (bear in mind that it’s VERY good on the GK1) and although the mags are lower capacity, they are interchangeable. It also feels quite a lot smaller in the hand, although in real terms it’s not that much. You can use the (crappy) open sights with pretty much any silencer, unlike the GK1. Having a Foster connector attached to the gun is a great idea - no hunting for probes.
The GK1 is a Meccano gun - you can spec it as a carbine, change grips, sights, and there’s a ton of 3d printed bits available, wheras the Evanix is not supported in that way. If you like messing about, the Huben is the clear winner. Accuracy wise, both are exceptional.
These pistols are at the very cutting edge of current air gun technology and the self-indexing systems work flawlessly. If I could only have one it would have to be the GK1, but I’m very glad that I’m lucky enough to be able to have both.
(In the pics below, the GK1 has an aftermarket 1911 style grip and a stock adapter fitted).
View attachment 764932View attachment 764933