AlWright71
Proactive member
Heym sr21 top
Brock & Norris lightweight hunter bottom.
I'm more than happy with field stock and would highly recommend it to others if they're still using the original polymer stock. It's certainly built well and for not a great cost compared to the alternatives. It's by no means lightweight though so if youre doing a lot of walking around it might be worth considering others. My issues with the original stock were poor eye alignment and the near horizontal grip, both of which have now been rectified with the MDT. The other bonus is it's compatibility with AICS magazines if thats your thingNice.....I
I have a soft spot for a howa 1500
How do you find the field stock?
It looks like a great way to have the XRS look without hurting the wallet,I'm considering one for my .243 Howa1500
Cheers buddy thats good to knowI'm more than happy with field stock and would highly recommend it to others if they're still using the original polymer stock. It's certainly built well and for not a great cost compared to the alternatives. It's by no means lightweight though so if youre doing a lot of walking around it might be worth considering others. My issues with the original stock were poor eye alignment and the near horizontal grip, both of which have now been rectified with the MDT. The other bonus is it's compatibility with AICS magazines if thats your thing![]()
Very very niceForgive me gents, if I posted this one, can't remember!
1942 Tikka M 91 M-N...View attachment 773222
View attachment 773223
3 shots in black at 200 yards..
View attachment 773224
Very very nice![]()
Thanks for replying with your observations. It may well be a rifle. I don't have much knowledge of the old firearms , however I note your comments and agree on the quality of manufacture, it does shine through.The musket, which might be a rifle [?] is not a modern replication, but is likely a Nepali-made issue item. It is VERY nicely-made, with its double-outlined lockplate. This is the lockplate of an original Pattern 53 Enfield rifle, later converted to a breech-loader using the Snider conversion -
View attachment 809109
I note that 'your' example has a nipple shield, showing that it gets used - so it might be a rifle?
This is a modern replica from Parker-Hale -
View attachment 809116
View attachment 809127
The wood on yours is clearly of better quality and shows lots of BLO patina that is unmistakably old.
This is my 1858 Pritchett rifle -
View attachment 809130
In that case, it's definitely a rifle. A 'musket' is a term used for a military smoothbore, like the Brown Bess.Thanks for replying with your observations. It may well be a rifle. I don't have much knowledge of the old firearms , however I note your comments and agree on the quality of manufacture, it does shine through.
It certainly gets used, here it is in action at 200 yards at the event where the photos were taken.
View attachment 809214
Or, in the case of an 1895 Winchester - a long barreled full length stock example.In that case, it's definitely a rifle. A 'musket' is a term used for a military smoothbore, like the Brown Bess.
Which company out of interest?Here is my most recent addition,
It is a spanish made reproduction of a Hawken rifle.
45 calibre.
Ardesa,Which company out of interest?

Rarer here than clogs for a yak. So, not a general term used in the British military lexicon for a rifled, magazine-fed, cartridge-firing military firearm..Or, in the case of an 1895 Winchester - a long barreled full length stock example.