The Parker Hale Whitworth variants are not to be derided at all. They shoot very well, sometimes better than the originals. It's just a shame that UK laws dictate you need a vacant slot on an FAC to purchase one.
This is my D series. Marked with the Whitworth wheatsheaf, and the Whitworth Company Limited. The woodwork is quite worn on the exterior, but the metal work and bore are quite good, and it shoots well. Although I have taken it off my certificate to replace it with something else, which I will come to later. The ram rod is a replacement. The foresight is slightly bigger than a P53 or P62 barleycorn, and has a windage adjustable blade. Otherwise it would accept a P53 bayonet.
I am informed, from a very reliable source. That Bill Curtis identified several 'D' series Whitworth, as volunteer versions or even prototypes, of the Pattern 1862. I have seen one other D series, and Auction details of a further one, which was numbered very close to mine. All three closely resemble pattern 62's.
View attachment 744571
View attachment 744572
I don't worry myself too much about the externals, TBH, so long as the bore is good, that's fine by me. ANY Whitworth rifle is worth having, IMO, even my poor old frawk, much derided back in the day by a representative of an august organisation, who, whilst claiming ownership of six such rifles, advised me to 'push the boat out, and not to bother with the cheap fakes from Birmingham'. I was put off joining - forever. I've since bought a second, earlier serial than the first, #888, which I had bought in 1986. This one, #420, dates from 1980, and was virtually unfired when I bought it three years back. The seller - the second owner - had bought it some eight years back, but he had never fired it.
I first started shooting a Lyman 535gr multi-groove bullet in# 420, with this set of holes being the first attempt at 100m with just 70gr of 3Fg and a couple of card wads.
They set up nicely into hexagonal form - hence the clear six-sided holes in the paper.... Here's a recovered example -
I've since located a Pedersoli mould back in Canada, and the guy selling it sent me an example made with it to try a fit. It was a perfect fit, and I had it off him.
This is where it goes -
Pedersoli's moulds are said to be of odd-sizes in my experience, and while you
could shoot an undersize bullet, and rely on a hefty charge to upset it, an oversize bullet is as much use as tits on a toad - and at almost £220 here - with handles - that's a lot of money to find out that it doesn't fit. I've yet to see a sizing die for a 1:20 twisted hexagonal bullet, but I dare say that there might be such a thing.
As an aside, this is me shooting Bill Maple's lovely P-H back in 1982 at Rose Ranges in Berlin/Zehlendorf - home of the 1936 Olympics shooting competitions. The photo was taken by Dr David Schiller and used in his book 'Schwartzpulver Digest' from Motorbook Verlag. I recommend it to anybody who speaks German.
So here is #420 in all its glory - 'fresh out of the box' and forty-five years old - I really don't give a hoot if it's a frawk or not, I love it.
Apologies to anybody not that interested in old bundooks, but it's a fact that once you get an old fart like me started, it's pretty darn near impossible to stop us.